{"id":"W3121787086","doi":"10.3233/jid200005","title":"Environment: The First Thing to Look at in Conceptual Design","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Computer science; Problem statement; Affordance; Conceptual design; Product (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Process (computing); Product design; Software engineering; Human–computer interaction; Systems engineering; Process management; Management science; Engineering; Programming language; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01535847,0.001295094,0.001318304,0.001991613,0.005739143,0.01269409,0.001645829,0.003763381,0.005181072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01560887,0.001381724,0.00141829,0.00153961,0.02091148,0.03772639,0.007893474,0.007595672,0.001494542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003312385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005132864,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002132353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002070406,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9806519,0.01457843,0.0006227159,0.001089498,0.002308595,0.0007488322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881328,0.007637259,0.0005457203,0.00161235,0.001452388,0.0006194616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004103419,0.00004373036,0.0004761167,0.0003324342,0.00001722896,0.0001306961,0.009971162,0.0007484522,0.0008117913,0.958358,0.002219927,0.02684942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000314399,0.0001584484,0.0004516002,0.000936799,0.00005296992,0.0003886547,0.01017802,0.00176272,0.001288122,0.7873431,0.1973292,0.00007888883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0107275,0.009266408,0.8517263,0.03216156,0.001529756,0.0002667202,0.0000911624,0.0004509113,0.09377963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4014981,0.01056976,0.5579136,0.007917887,0.0008561978,0.0008520372,0.0001611816,0.0007736398,0.01945768],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01535847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08122426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02948102912822613,"score_gpt":0.2617289591941601,"score_spread":0.232247930065934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}