{"id":"W3121789641","doi":"","title":"An Argumentation Framework for Contested Cases of Statutory Interpretation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory interpretation; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Statutory law; Computer science; Resolution (logic); Set (abstract data type); Law; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008964435,0.00007952471,0.0001138748,0.00009982697,0.00008259559,0.00004674019,0.0002626985,0.00004754302,0.000004916124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001482,0.00005575724,0.00006146291,0.00008438653,0.00001543903,0.000837941,0.00001036526,0.0001627805,0.000003644634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003456496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004880023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002318488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001063149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987115,0.0001073607,0.000300278,0.0001527436,0.0001728992,0.0005551868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990133,0.0002556455,0.0003480548,0.0001686752,0.0001672107,0.00004711274],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008787862,0.00008183147,0.001621319,0.00001297084,0.00006582156,8.729183e-7,0.001070281,0.00002930092,0.02725093,0.7658145,0.00002314093,0.2039411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004163372,0.004985616,0.009631076,0.0005569143,0.00006301413,0.0004379138,0.002091493,0.03284099,0.03582639,0.9083214,0.0005214475,0.0005603733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2016769,0.0002011234,0.7974753,0.0001962367,0.0002660188,0.0001508291,0.000002903892,0.00002273919,0.000008022118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917599,0.0001448415,0.00784914,0.00003936918,0.0001034588,0.0000115153,0.000002362228,0.00000765388,0.0000817332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7900831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2273714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0161036545966858,"score_gpt":0.2986811660499387,"score_spread":0.2825775114532529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}