{"id":"W3121892939","doi":"10.36644/mlr.114.7.constitutional","title":"Constitutional Avoidance as Interpretation and as Remedy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Law and economics; Epistemology; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Constitution; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01435618,0.000969449,0.001345354,0.00236513,0.006265142,0.01247221,0.0038973,0.01106545,0.005902764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01970396,0.0005311701,0.001252361,0.001535777,0.06954578,0.01489154,0.009335238,0.01604313,0.00116942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008230024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00853601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003089758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002479883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9768306,0.009747604,0.001121784,0.004265121,0.006188988,0.001846016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990428,0.00484888,0.0007756332,0.002512821,0.001080148,0.0003544787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001536316,0.000002038029,0.00001374616,0.000008267424,0.000001189046,0.0000137687,0.0003101559,0.00005175485,0.0000308665,0.9981378,0.0004816838,0.0009470292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001145692,0.00001054275,0.00003127287,0.00005430118,0.000007344605,0.00003980746,0.0002399077,0.0002192839,0.0001382106,0.9560742,0.04316232,0.00001125058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01681169,0.01245925,0.151611,0.09219696,0.003930754,0.0001734336,0.0001106705,0.0003683921,0.7223379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8666375,0.004314312,0.0298297,0.02919547,0.004572737,0.0004970501,0.0001180126,0.0003940962,0.06444111],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01435618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07592362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01983119137489859,"score_gpt":0.316266567124098,"score_spread":0.2964353757491994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}