{"id":"W3121895388","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.02.004","title":"The long-term performance of acquiring firms: A re-examination of an anomaly","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Banking & Finance","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Event study; Abnormal return; Econometrics; Robustness (evolution); Payment; Term (time); Corporate governance; Economics; Stock (firearms); Stock market; Business; Financial economics; Actuarial science; Monetary economics; Stock exchange; Finance; Macroeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014534,0.0002218574,0.0003936093,0.001829158,0.0003957592,0.001426153,0.0008330005,0.0006686616,0.001916914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004670688,0.0001078597,0.0003465242,0.002806437,0.0004987994,0.001950713,0.0008647709,0.0008600623,0.000645673],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008473675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006736703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01710977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01551772,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994146,0.00005088353,0.00007313071,0.0001394158,0.0002087674,0.0001133238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939083,0.001242945,0.0019833,0.0008490874,0.001572806,0.0004435272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003964325,0.0001635985,0.9387506,0.00007427033,0.0002146625,0.0008164387,0.001094841,0.0008733314,0.005185417,0.001661882,0.003339615,0.04742886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004974524,0.00007726604,0.9944034,0.00001580869,0.00006326757,0.0002327756,0.0004896552,0.0008324666,0.0007617761,0.0003362118,0.002770785,0.00001155507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945574,0.0005506724,0.0002250215,0.0008012119,0.00002872139,0.000004277152,0.0008644547,0.00002336625,0.002944961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980342,0.0002264309,0.00008744896,0.00006657914,0.00005824446,0.000001489086,0.0007887415,0.00001189199,0.0007250725],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01710977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0340203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01421609975697322,"score_gpt":0.2226529706306639,"score_spread":0.2084368708736907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}