{"id":"W3121900764","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-6803.2000.tb00735.x","title":"TIME‐VARYING VOLATILITY IN CANADIAN AND U.S. STOCK INDEX AND INDEX FUTURES MARKETS: A MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Financial Research","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Volatility (finance); Econometrics; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Economics; Multivariate statistics; Financial economics; Autoregressive model; Stock exchange; Heteroscedasticity; Stock market index; Composite index; Futures market; Stock market; Context (archaeology); Statistics; Mathematics; Geography; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008836563,0.0001382461,0.0005271489,0.001265706,0.0004279791,0.00008987089,0.0003175524,0.0001731196,0.0003547181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001228726,0.0001208124,0.00009286618,0.00130906,0.0002139322,0.0003011857,0.00006674236,0.0009715154,0.00001169597],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002385945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003498756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2345358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1657036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979876,0.0002143622,0.0007906801,0.0002428571,0.0001661022,0.0005983588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987948,0.0003630643,0.0001882138,0.0002466774,0.0001467413,0.0002604817],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009308198,0.00005710851,0.9347658,0.00002175428,0.00007540563,0.00002296251,0.003433293,0.0008631626,0.00001091873,0.0005069855,0.0001994905,0.05911236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004670458,0.0000601211,0.7884008,0.00002491863,0.00001253295,0.000005681351,0.00003493893,0.1998676,0.000001532489,0.007327284,0.003697833,0.00009967879],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938947,0.003576657,0.0002359994,0.000734171,0.00004984005,0.0001847593,0.00004426502,0.00000284197,0.001276788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980897,0.001244321,0.0001022792,0.00006111216,0.0001181974,0.000002916768,0.000001165655,0.00001154974,0.0003687724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1990044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8495201,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04410233027000458,"score_gpt":0.3022969969599835,"score_spread":0.2581946666899789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}