{"id":"W3121990389","doi":"10.5167/uzh-173253","title":"On the risk of studying practices in isolation: Linking what, who, and how in strategy research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Limiting; Perspective (graphical); Isolation (microbiology); Best practice; Resource (disambiguation); Focus (optics); Knowledge management; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Management science; Computer science; Engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002400857,0.00008085908,0.000167406,0.0002814119,0.0004191855,0.0003283668,0.0003125903,0.00002548252,0.000008548344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002720235,0.00007090329,0.00001418381,0.0005545281,0.0001527542,0.001923057,0.0008961484,0.0001884009,0.000001679011],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001458669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002095392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002099791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001675571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990154,0.0002873882,0.0001015686,0.0002195183,0.0002526101,0.000123543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985947,0.0007836085,0.0003492173,0.0001199171,0.0001407768,0.00001176733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002949272,0.000175479,0.9266312,0.0001794618,0.00008161685,0.00004530562,0.004870876,0.0003030013,0.0001244443,0.06214035,0.003713638,0.0014397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001270425,0.0001200772,0.8639129,0.0004282504,0.00006039392,0.000001181916,0.0940576,0.005321541,0.00001453519,0.03039525,0.00423115,0.0001866361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9675146,0.0004114087,0.0001929459,0.001541863,0.00004094846,0.0004110529,9.429591e-7,0.000005893125,0.02988029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987229,0.000365163,0.0002839596,0.00003510476,0.00005133271,7.461411e-7,0.000003386322,0.000005356842,0.0005320954],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08918673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3224078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09300657664055638,"score_gpt":0.2727897623803798,"score_spread":0.1797831857398234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}