{"id":"W3121990389","doi":"10.5167/uzh-173253","title":"On the risk of studying practices in isolation: Linking what, who, and how in strategy research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Limiting; Perspective (graphical); Isolation (microbiology); Best practice; Resource (disambiguation); Focus (optics); Knowledge management; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Management science; Computer science; Engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1611118,0.001725976,0.003423324,0.01090804,0.01208142,0.03150117,0.004267097,0.007445229,0.003602833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2023044,0.001755446,0.001233777,0.01229182,0.1349819,0.05431087,0.03032895,0.01704399,0.0007508086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008777524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01274439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004989896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005251421,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8099699,0.1540954,0.005950988,0.01149048,0.01617441,0.002318816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5833887,0.3626466,0.01575752,0.02582836,0.009534691,0.002844129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006346898,0.0001049939,0.005160014,0.00107351,0.0001260471,0.0002158691,0.2356716,0.0005947668,0.0003333402,0.707717,0.001400673,0.0475387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003292442,0.00009636652,0.002046856,0.002097951,0.00007503357,0.0002645311,0.07931458,0.0009654268,0.0005026769,0.894547,0.01997807,0.00007842556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2014027,0.0572853,0.3939648,0.2436787,0.002890169,0.0007627612,0.0002139624,0.0002858721,0.0995157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9221161,0.01335405,0.04821669,0.01098172,0.001380187,0.001498419,0.00008232611,0.0002079396,0.002162519],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8388882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8520506,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09300657664055638,"score_gpt":0.2727897623803798,"score_spread":0.1797831857398234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}