{"id":"W3122001280","doi":"","title":"Using Contingent Valuation With Respondent Uncertainty To Estimate The Costs Of Climate Change Programs: An Application To Canadian Landowners","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Respondent; Contingent valuation; Bivariate analysis; Valuation (finance); Econometrics; Preference; Willingness to pay; Economics; Climate change; Actuarial science; Limiting; Willingness to accept; Statistics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Engineering; Political science; Accounting","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01636451,0.001095278,0.001273106,0.003393597,0.001487584,0.00230675,0.002433769,0.001433444,0.003738678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0579299,0.0006555404,0.00147104,0.006543966,0.001530193,0.001666984,0.001883361,0.001833033,0.000128781],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01166935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005762751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6014279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4702181,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930474,0.00518764,0.000208303,0.0004351813,0.0007918902,0.0003296183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9556758,0.03842495,0.002320206,0.001467332,0.001763027,0.0003486684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004820504,0.0003791159,0.1321647,0.0002709011,0.0007658279,0.0005185056,0.002620654,0.63846,0.0005595222,0.1104998,0.00210069,0.1111783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004550505,0.00006515387,0.01891126,0.00005535938,0.00006431901,0.00006910993,0.000717973,0.9580757,0.0002350736,0.02062374,0.001053983,0.00008275353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.517978,0.001163104,0.4672676,0.001657275,0.00005255075,0.001062067,0.00156689,0.000259956,0.008992547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9052162,0.0004670448,0.09278614,0.00006096524,0.00001975838,0.0003460761,0.0004308819,0.00001439844,0.000658531],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3985721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8018387,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04802793120196664,"score_gpt":0.2534531558263132,"score_spread":0.2054252246243465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}