{"id":"W3122071386","doi":"10.20944/preprints201909.0230.v1","title":"An Economic Examination of Collateralization in Different Financial Markets","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Preprints.org","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Collateralization; Collateralized debt obligation; Credit risk; Bankruptcy; Asset (computer security); Business; Systemic risk; Collateral; Economics; Financial economics; Monetary economics; Actuarial science; Finance; Financial crisis; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002093459,0.0002484344,0.0005739965,0.001827481,0.0004809703,0.002512174,0.0005050487,0.000946079,0.004376444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01427122,0.0001893341,0.0006850284,0.001615426,0.001980403,0.005438403,0.001250035,0.001179529,0.0001533929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001240177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004958367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001111123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007489199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992373,0.0003064581,0.00005239341,0.000101261,0.0002047275,0.00009784757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859509,0.006722818,0.005165231,0.0008947179,0.0005794411,0.0006868632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005271897,0.00040108,0.1408047,0.0002247282,0.0002140063,0.001924001,0.0004504784,0.1036373,0.00673287,0.7011014,0.001735812,0.04224645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001617219,0.0006543599,0.2321054,0.0002003053,0.0002242667,0.001617985,0.0009040929,0.3344659,0.005974649,0.4167733,0.006790605,0.0001273826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9605396,0.001955163,0.02031908,0.001010424,0.00002262514,0.00005931815,0.0002990339,0.00005256174,0.01574209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980761,0.0003429939,0.0008695905,0.0000172199,0.00003187293,0.000008048623,0.00006204687,0.000005549879,0.0005866172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004376444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01464063,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0614719136766081,"score_gpt":0.284672200984204,"score_spread":0.2232002873075959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}