{"id":"W3122113869","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.24034","title":"ASSESSING IMPACTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE ON ABORIGINAL PEOPLE: AN ECONOMIC EXAMINATION OF SUBSISTENCE RESOURCE USE AND VALUE","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsistence agriculture; Resource (disambiguation); Value (mathematics); Environmental resource management; Geography; Construct (python library); Business; Natural resource economics; Environmental planning; Economics; Agriculture; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001729128,0.0002734489,0.0002203562,0.002060039,0.001202105,0.001385155,0.0003504937,0.0003846832,0.001491682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004365728,0.0002011487,0.00044605,0.002327008,0.0009387388,0.0009487384,0.0008714222,0.0004271784,0.0001246581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004928547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001788151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1038611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2074751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999162,0.0004043666,0.00003593043,0.00003774796,0.0002348354,0.0001250837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980987,0.0009457826,0.0003536869,0.00008778937,0.0003811067,0.0001329655],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002462059,0.000541186,0.9260272,0.0002525908,0.0002252935,0.001268832,0.007457382,0.006289346,0.001593742,0.005852679,0.0006802373,0.04956545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000812869,0.0003026975,0.980203,0.00004141781,0.00006241348,0.0002816604,0.01129618,0.004041972,0.0004224922,0.001593957,0.001725459,0.00002053026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960258,0.0001464695,0.0003203665,0.0001812651,0.000002027361,0.00005772497,0.0001656214,0.000001581253,0.003099089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972799,0.0005076946,0.001153303,0.0000302151,0.000007356744,0.00005112596,0.0001669921,0.000001280988,0.000802078],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1038611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2065131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1446434885533543,"score_gpt":0.2378908948066707,"score_spread":0.0932474062533164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}