{"id":"W3122199453","doi":"10.1163/22134514-45060013","title":"Inside the Judicial Mind: Exploring Judicial Methodology in the Mixed Legal System of Quebec","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Judicial independence; Jurisdiction; Political science; De facto; Judicial activism; Economic Justice; Judicial review; Judicial opinion","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010684,0.0002873563,0.0003731096,0.003644438,0.01436641,0.01139933,0.002326002,0.001643448,0.00352108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02198915,0.0003296897,0.0002776408,0.003887047,0.0155861,0.003221562,0.003591068,0.002030311,0.0001406616],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09669288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08697185,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9342633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9757274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9889153,0.006153553,0.0002150955,0.0007475141,0.002192801,0.001775729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752535,0.01367896,0.002251383,0.0007547163,0.006188809,0.001872667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001290027,0.0001370875,0.1014527,0.0002262752,0.0001286987,0.001696296,0.2748821,0.003103549,0.002629563,0.5279124,0.008108363,0.07959406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109364,0.0001764417,0.3028068,0.001301919,0.0001592441,0.0006411657,0.4423934,0.01743038,0.001986184,0.0741087,0.1586278,0.0002585243],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8291218,0.00392158,0.01225428,0.02098526,0.00009085647,0.0001876562,0.000199727,0.00004106423,0.1331978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948313,0.0003107358,0.001596078,0.000448059,0.00001257229,0.00002878388,0.00002721798,0.000007596327,0.002737765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09669288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7015592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1913512860324122,"score_gpt":0.3513547767073328,"score_spread":0.1600034906749206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}