{"id":"W3122296257","doi":"","title":"The Possibility of Naturalistic Jurisprudence: Legal Positivism and Natural Law Theory Revisited","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal positivism; Naturalism; Positivism; Jurisprudence; Epistemology; Legal formalism; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy of law; Natural law; Contradiction; Legal realism; Natural (archaeology); Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Legal research; Comparative law; Black letter law; Private law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002151846,0.0001496149,0.0001775993,0.00002808273,0.002057083,0.0003629834,0.0008229629,0.00005535892,0.000005833321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001360595,0.00008671253,0.0001054336,0.0000619706,0.000840625,0.0005269927,0.000136459,0.001785398,0.000004044246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001307591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000381384,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001068274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003210372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976404,0.0003083899,0.0002808366,0.0002635507,0.0003297653,0.001177063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986686,0.0003559444,0.0003591927,0.0004692252,0.00007944405,0.00006755516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001130421,0.00001987378,0.0003415468,0.000006948111,0.00001585774,0.00001267992,0.00005003794,2.149428e-7,0.03715685,0.9520282,0.0000144513,0.01024025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005959665,0.0002629209,0.02190375,0.00006985919,0.00004413222,0.001505099,0.0001358394,0.0001235109,0.01776812,0.9565585,0.0008120106,0.0002202771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863335,0.00793297,0.0001077779,0.001719755,0.00048449,0.0001513212,0.000007089086,0.00002010274,0.003242961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995127,0.002435374,0.000008641162,0.0001768567,0.0001635696,0.00000137664,3.376124e-7,0.00001086719,0.00207598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02156221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008667796927032576,"score_gpt":0.2717742069278065,"score_spread":0.2631064100007739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}