{"id":"W3122305632","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1287858","title":"Seeing Double: Human Rights Impact Through Qualitative and Quantitative Eyes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Psychology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02784759,0.0004981438,0.0004548803,0.002717229,0.003334177,0.008369535,0.001306293,0.00143607,0.02251929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1238635,0.0003846575,0.0004906078,0.002361589,0.00763571,0.01585826,0.008246843,0.003535995,0.0006291601],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005057315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003676215,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006565157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007500894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9735942,0.01923963,0.0005089666,0.00153274,0.003905044,0.001219466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8203852,0.1563672,0.008029928,0.006439,0.007270961,0.001507614],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001885955,0.001443309,0.1189386,0.001593485,0.0003013674,0.0005131505,0.4089026,0.003267706,0.004544074,0.2395331,0.01400586,0.2050708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002118508,0.0008864125,0.1204119,0.001205159,0.0003181985,0.0002349066,0.5912634,0.01076896,0.01275191,0.2248138,0.03683027,0.0003034586],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7828951,0.000493821,0.02474755,0.006561641,0.0001848706,0.0003842121,0.001235132,0.0001612614,0.1833364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993818,0.00007273228,0.002554277,0.0002388487,0.00001506679,0.000158724,0.00007031099,0.00005711191,0.003014825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02784759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1472739,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06590774323846886,"score_gpt":0.4191816982926915,"score_spread":0.3532739550542226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}