{"id":"W3122386848","doi":"","title":"A MIXED BENTHAM-RAWLS CRITERION FOR INTERGENERATIONAL EQUITY: THEORY AND IMPLICATIONS","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Victoria University of Wellington; Victoria University; University of Canterbury; University of Otago","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Economics; Intergenerational equity; Social welfare function; Welfare; Mathematical economics; Social choice theory; Social Welfare; Equity (law); Ranking (information retrieval); Welfarism; Term (time); Function (biology); Yield (engineering); Microeconomics; Welfare economics; Computer science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00717627,0.0006801796,0.000906121,0.002017036,0.001244848,0.002465734,0.0020557,0.001579012,0.007894157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01769443,0.0003594118,0.0009432876,0.001675073,0.003516701,0.005230484,0.003000198,0.002278082,0.0005141738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003551388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001475171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002366948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002501089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978451,0.001161212,0.00008567329,0.0002774505,0.0004480457,0.000182494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931513,0.004815992,0.0003900057,0.0004540328,0.0008494334,0.0003392203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007507883,0.00001345233,0.0004528951,0.00002268804,0.000008718596,0.00002124226,0.00007685996,0.01085875,0.00006905905,0.9761698,0.0009475669,0.01135133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005685785,0.00001284339,0.0002221539,0.00002277546,0.000003694522,0.00002431453,0.00003771699,0.02678607,0.00009219575,0.9707892,0.001995796,0.000007551673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0527817,0.001690684,0.8923524,0.006499224,0.0001093633,0.00012232,0.0003757266,0.00007450509,0.0459941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7915047,0.001675245,0.1853137,0.0007249725,0.0003180332,0.0005209458,0.0002419007,0.0001253794,0.01957512],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007894157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03795218,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1265854380087581,"score_gpt":0.4387692216076456,"score_spread":0.3121837835988875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}