{"id":"W3122388689","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-6803.2009.01249.x","title":"THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF USING REALIZED VOLATILITY IN FORECASTING FUTURE IMPLIED VOLATILITY","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Financial Research","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Implied volatility; Volatility smile; Volatility (finance); Volatility swap; Economics; Forward volatility; Volatility risk premium; Econometrics; Variance swap; Realized variance; Financial economics; Stochastic volatility; Valuation of options; Transaction cost; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003475888,0.0007912724,0.0006376465,0.0009882504,0.0002094035,0.001854762,0.0006412187,0.0008964676,0.0009073789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02646949,0.0003644992,0.000368651,0.001001207,0.0005319202,0.004384052,0.001064583,0.001391283,0.0002102156],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003123278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003815768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003874147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002394088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989693,0.00051548,0.000069676,0.0001252614,0.0002744545,0.00004579881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802659,0.01525364,0.001517283,0.001469522,0.001222519,0.0002710266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001323969,0.0002136332,0.0988312,0.00007960464,0.000520478,0.0003320095,0.0001060502,0.761518,0.004777443,0.01189502,0.0009250664,0.1194775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002009772,0.0001123397,0.01374654,0.00002046696,0.00005981788,0.00004204381,0.00002965716,0.9760352,0.001382065,0.008315891,0.0002034179,0.0000324706],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9117331,0.00101973,0.08175945,0.001308542,0.00008420482,0.00002166658,0.0002634556,0.0001758747,0.003634081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993414,0.000211263,0.005938222,0.00003005426,0.0000501006,0.000004120429,0.0001397884,0.000009932067,0.0002025978],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003874147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01838249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1505378361592323,"score_gpt":0.3576453057812297,"score_spread":0.2071074696219974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}