{"id":"W3122412112","doi":"10.1080/1351847x.2018.1491875","title":"The systematic pricing of market sentiment shock","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Finance","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Tyndale University College & Seminary","funders":"","keywords":"Capital asset pricing model; Security market line; Economics; Consumption-based capital asset pricing model; Systematic risk; Market liquidity; Financial economics; Arbitrage pricing theory; Shock (circulatory); Investment theory; Risk premium; Rational pricing; Liquidity risk; Stock market; Econometrics; Monetary economics; Context (archaeology)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002326646,0.0002358503,0.0001811365,0.0002013479,0.0001700426,0.0009073275,0.0001795412,0.0003985946,0.002814147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002453443,0.0001199444,0.000244115,0.0001925021,0.0003050713,0.0007869994,0.0005281201,0.0005237802,0.0001954405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003476725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002670275,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001414303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00100556,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998999,0.00001662325,0.000006736195,0.00001731778,0.00003480747,0.00002456738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991417,0.0002664184,0.000343821,0.00006858262,0.0001162764,0.0000631791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003891632,0.0003585244,0.1746298,0.0002697959,0.0002618197,0.002493468,0.0009626216,0.05750194,0.04784377,0.5433507,0.01291054,0.1590278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007593969,0.0005838468,0.3147729,0.00009005325,0.0001731469,0.001138275,0.0004081939,0.3894774,0.01197072,0.2701014,0.01108675,0.0001212867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9407427,0.0005258627,0.03625182,0.001032317,0.00009414668,0.00002559715,0.000201212,0.00006674312,0.02105952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978696,0.000175845,0.0006492718,0.00005149525,0.00004661317,0.000004569814,0.00004036243,0.000005278537,0.001156911],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002814147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009414256,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02103159687679037,"score_gpt":0.1998767781425518,"score_spread":0.1788451812657614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}