{"id":"W3122560792","doi":"","title":"The Principle of Proportionality in the Viking and Laval Cases: An appropriate standard of judicial review?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Global Energy Security and Policy","field":"Energy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Political science; Treaty; Energy security; Sanctions; Charter; Treaty of Lisbon; Proportionality (law); Context (archaeology); Conditionality; Political economy; International trade; Public administration; European integration; Law and economics; Politics; Economics; Law; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0971266,0.000720275,0.002278477,0.002201974,0.006754695,0.02020825,0.006024153,0.02202705,0.002485588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2195942,0.001148414,0.001662211,0.002434334,0.03208401,0.02151073,0.006916643,0.02018612,0.001106879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007378834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01426705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004875244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00528306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8620377,0.06989318,0.01005686,0.0158786,0.03437702,0.007756666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9112176,0.06177818,0.005701432,0.01029333,0.009772678,0.001236806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007996798,0.00001139452,0.0001151183,0.00003981471,0.00001245714,0.0000581762,0.000779164,0.0001649039,0.00009407075,0.9891682,0.00327608,0.006272627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004141715,0.00004536295,0.0004391639,0.0002872208,0.00002332111,0.0001441937,0.0005686529,0.00116076,0.0005730538,0.9410474,0.05560346,0.00006608824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03116103,0.01633417,0.2991633,0.3489116,0.008056174,0.0007126242,0.0001440598,0.0004008122,0.2951161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8173551,0.003976058,0.073818,0.0717948,0.007057769,0.001279676,0.00008327306,0.0002644389,0.02437088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0971266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5136607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04209824290612355,"score_gpt":0.3662062557501618,"score_spread":0.3241080128440382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}