{"id":"W3122700238","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4480","title":"Dizzying Dialogue: Canadian Courts and the Continuing Justification of the Dispossession Of Aboriginal People","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Doctrine; Supreme court; Conciliation; Law; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Arbitration","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006329672,0.0000851083,0.0002185517,0.00003943761,0.0003388927,0.00003560832,0.0005183195,0.00005881202,0.00004113857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007228157,0.0000494204,0.00005151862,0.0002226868,0.0006263696,0.0002268475,0.00009388272,0.00009643639,0.000001615712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005645095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001287116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4261197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1853325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989223,0.0001630171,0.0002577208,0.0001361696,0.0003197873,0.0002010129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988956,0.0002911525,0.0002756415,0.0001693901,0.0002761061,0.00009205119],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002737411,0.00008771555,0.180625,0.0004355948,0.0001034006,0.000001159113,0.7456391,0.00006125478,0.002753231,0.06336348,0.0009445256,0.005711788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004284804,0.00001814922,0.973573,0.0002398116,0.0003202798,2.608785e-7,0.01989733,0.0000397774,0.001806193,0.0003035597,0.003251398,0.0001218057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.988516,0.0002066234,0.00002761721,0.001587885,0.0003167319,0.0005298135,0.00001672835,0.000008179021,0.008790416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993805,0.0001125019,0.0001526839,0.00005395237,0.00009925338,0.0000156003,7.080879e-7,0.000005942592,0.0001789093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7929479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.829533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03848112590642711,"score_gpt":0.3252010623644886,"score_spread":0.2867199364580615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}