{"id":"W3122789242","doi":"","title":"Assessing the Societal Impact of Research: The Relational Engagement Approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Goldsmiths (University of London)","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Scholarship; Societal impact of nanotechnology; Public engagement; Stakeholder engagement; Customer engagement; Impact assessment; Political science; Social impact; Public relations; Knowledge management; Sociology; Social media; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001466138,0.00009002108,0.000126158,0.0001378748,0.0008418612,0.00005815907,0.0004604552,0.00003243887,0.0006125559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001396541,0.00004785657,0.0001466347,0.0007099545,0.0005051239,0.0009717961,0.0006070182,0.0001180523,0.00006355174],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006078635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003749933,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004197125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002951213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989108,0.00006278753,0.0001182691,0.0001616247,0.0005570999,0.0001893976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989056,0.0003167545,0.0002037828,0.0002128827,0.0003540862,0.000006871843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007345396,0.0002539309,0.4229586,0.0001957109,0.0006955628,0.000004829366,0.001238231,0.0003390738,0.0005522048,0.4320416,0.1337046,0.007942237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006903544,0.00001511774,0.964459,0.0000499255,0.00008919346,4.635547e-7,0.006914051,0.001011675,0.000007849602,0.006204007,0.02044115,0.0001171859],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8327353,0.0002719242,0.01940997,0.01156433,0.000140885,0.0006495711,0.00001010573,0.00007207784,0.1351458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967324,0.00003922274,0.0004812329,0.00005664882,0.0001663712,5.006833e-7,0.000006347456,0.000008370864,0.002508862],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5415004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6707057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09085870182192692,"score_gpt":0.2911203146804418,"score_spread":0.2002616128585149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}