{"id":"W3122806605","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00357.x","title":"TESTING FOR PRO‐POORNESS OF GROWTH, WITH AN APPLICATION TO MEXICO","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Review of Income and Wealth","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; University of Ottawa; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Sample (material); Population; Geography; Econometrics; Statistics; Demographic economics; Economics; Demography; Economic growth; Mathematics; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006648988,0.0004528901,0.0004993599,0.003949562,0.0007586653,0.001219239,0.0006922249,0.0005502341,0.001886621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02729666,0.0001730026,0.0005502184,0.004877903,0.001258902,0.0008597145,0.001123473,0.0007930717,0.0001850616],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009889849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001384342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0179377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02273126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996498,0.002416471,0.0001599089,0.000375214,0.0004545269,0.00009590301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860361,0.00960875,0.002787898,0.0006278026,0.000824961,0.0001145384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001224627,0.00009792804,0.5050683,0.0009988851,0.0006755567,0.000378618,0.002322132,0.010514,0.0007813036,0.08646524,0.008253529,0.384322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009009999,0.0004157037,0.7577347,0.001263011,0.00051328,0.0007351465,0.005728109,0.03690927,0.002006202,0.1415804,0.05288598,0.0001380634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4564768,0.06179278,0.3997384,0.01696882,0.0005159717,0.00046247,0.005153846,0.0005602755,0.0583306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8675641,0.0188586,0.1076856,0.0006549179,0.0003340449,0.0006738972,0.001065033,0.00004136275,0.003122373],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0179377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03566658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05180506072803285,"score_gpt":0.3791109812556399,"score_spread":0.327305920527607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}