{"id":"W3122926443","doi":"10.4236/tel.2013.36052","title":"w-MPS Risk Aversion and the CAPM","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics Letters","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Capital asset pricing model; Economics; Preference; Risk aversion (psychology); Bond; Mathematical economics; Asset (computer security); Econometrics; Financial economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Microeconomics; Computer science; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009972898,0.0002052687,0.0004649076,0.00007936316,0.0002179024,0.0002060473,0.0003348297,0.00009606228,0.002264869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000110062,0.0001722282,0.0001571604,0.0000395831,0.001590078,0.0002775109,0.0001762263,0.0002560452,0.00221826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007811422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006487946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004157031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007888003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985105,0.0000474339,0.0005864248,0.000452449,0.00001235435,0.0003908744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986811,0.0003951509,0.0002800628,0.0004886171,0.00001055362,0.0001445219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004751664,0.000009991042,0.001110794,0.000004385879,0.00005148419,3.088797e-7,0.0003871754,0.0001793796,0.000008085131,0.9966262,0.001025908,0.0005487672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001628592,0.00002111469,0.001277354,0.000003603828,0.000013426,0.000007067606,0.0001283486,0.02006313,0.00002548739,0.9703212,0.0062335,0.0002771605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9388452,0.0002800791,0.003595192,0.02134645,0.0003959889,0.0003940047,0.00007073961,0.00003746671,0.03503485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920529,0.0008402829,0.0004435137,0.006227326,0.0001679373,0.00004886793,0.000005949089,0.00003397347,0.0001792702],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05320764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004378348114667399,"score_gpt":0.1403235633507672,"score_spread":0.1359452152360998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}