{"id":"W3123112265","doi":"10.1108/j.jfe.2001.12.003","title":"Welfare Implications of the Allowable Cut Effect in the Context of Sustained Yield and Sustainable Development Forestry","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture Food and Rural Development","funders":"","keywords":"Yield (engineering); Welfare; Context (archaeology); Sustainable development; Economics; Forestry; Natural resource economics; Political science; Physics; Geography; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000637362,0.00007042274,0.0001335384,0.000036059,0.00008947976,0.00001355274,0.0002856817,0.00002877647,0.0000792248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003777559,0.00004436514,0.0000499341,0.00008927014,0.0001204095,0.0001656013,0.000160092,0.00008275899,0.000001306512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000169047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002016268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000336714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002003718,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993029,0.00003028159,0.0003792036,0.00007304805,0.00007576378,0.0001388089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993799,0.00008334218,0.0003348406,0.0001643407,0.000008215559,0.00002932941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004623249,0.00007130088,0.9864012,0.00002919204,0.00001604817,0.000003152717,0.0005960713,0.00281231,0.0000869274,0.00753238,0.0008796504,0.001525549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004483932,0.00009555763,0.9619312,0.00001393629,0.00001501332,0.00001580401,0.004712613,0.00006636135,0.0005920185,0.001268242,0.03078721,0.00005361481],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915532,0.00002835159,0.00006091089,0.004995302,0.00002212452,0.0002562549,7.810788e-7,8.924321e-7,0.003082221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988273,0.00009224396,0.0001135906,0.0005443102,0.000005605959,0.00000758641,6.468874e-7,0.000004553202,0.00040412],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02990756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1809158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008133451360486647,"score_gpt":0.1999263791835712,"score_spread":0.1917929278230846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}