{"id":"W3123175809","doi":"10.4337/jhre.2013.01.04","title":"Security of the person, peace of mind: a precautionary approach to environmental uncertainty","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights and the Environment","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Precautionary principle; Human rights; Environmental security; Political science; Environmental ethics; Environmental law; Human health; Law and economics; Human security; Uncertainty; Business; Law; Sociology; Environmental health; Ecology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006703762,0.00007420023,0.0001624846,0.00003308105,0.0003880486,0.00001628794,0.0002552744,0.00003113716,0.0008241716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003533847,0.00003442653,0.0001252962,0.00002614801,0.0007213131,0.00008670606,0.00007382321,0.0001038987,0.000007706335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008295528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008106799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006060753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004263972,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988309,0.000245306,0.0002623092,0.00008747349,0.0004664893,0.000107575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994587,0.00002981549,0.000290499,0.0001414757,0.000007582297,0.00007192016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003446052,0.004265476,0.00686984,0.00009213016,0.0007842904,0.00000361733,0.7362537,0.004842482,0.008355779,0.1924595,0.0365777,0.009150907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00577815,0.000836838,0.3736033,0.0001406685,0.0004653232,0.00001939439,0.09547702,0.0006590177,0.001032629,0.06286996,0.4585583,0.0005594326],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905165,0.0001601077,0.00006102609,0.001375963,0.00005605091,0.0004248231,0.000003265453,9.780515e-7,0.007401263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969671,0.0001125337,0.000119383,0.00005779088,0.000064265,0.000006927228,4.808181e-7,0.000002917719,0.002668622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6407766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9024101,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01272905277997012,"score_gpt":0.2287882679838309,"score_spread":0.2160592152038608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}