{"id":"W3123175809","doi":"10.4337/jhre.2013.01.04","title":"Security of the person, peace of mind: a precautionary approach to environmental uncertainty","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights and the Environment","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Precautionary principle; Human rights; Environmental security; Political science; Environmental ethics; Environmental law; Human health; Law and economics; Human security; Uncertainty; Business; Law; Sociology; Environmental health; Ecology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008257989,0.0006638888,0.0004743446,0.002239661,0.006354766,0.009114446,0.00168727,0.004699012,0.002281049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007891879,0.0002794735,0.0006450136,0.0009448355,0.06572862,0.009944893,0.01055881,0.006544347,0.0002192724],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006268043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005012838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002101782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002619896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929302,0.004781584,0.0001852697,0.0004783609,0.001009308,0.0006153052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936411,0.00424165,0.0007400739,0.0004621104,0.0004754163,0.0004396035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009559043,0.00001641701,0.000328438,0.00003519355,0.000007453698,0.00008379551,0.01402675,0.0005177128,0.00008225763,0.9778274,0.0004421155,0.006622929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006222272,0.00004103356,0.0006946393,0.0002007193,0.000007857308,0.0001567181,0.01231766,0.0004899812,0.0001489204,0.949412,0.03650128,0.00002287035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.07483626,0.02099219,0.1502966,0.1254457,0.00141032,0.0001697035,0.00004886185,0.0000702956,0.6267301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790847,0.002997969,0.009864479,0.002959117,0.0003507571,0.00009718896,0.00001106732,0.00002181185,0.004612896],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009114446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04547805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01272905277997012,"score_gpt":0.2287882679838309,"score_spread":0.2160592152038608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}