{"id":"W3123239245","doi":"","title":"Unit Root Testing with Stationary Covariates and a Structural Break in the Trend Function","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Washington","keywords":"Unit root; Univariate; Mathematics; Multivariate statistics; Covariate; Structural break; Econometrics; Statistics; Function (biology); Sample (material); Unit root test; Power function; Power (physics); Statistical hypothesis testing; Focus (optics); Sample size determination; Cointegration; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002312811,0.0002610584,0.0004962501,0.0006224234,0.0002043248,0.0001798133,0.000391265,0.0002786107,0.00004216606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003970388,0.0002435155,0.00005514577,0.000266776,0.0002051843,0.000208218,0.0003186129,0.001354778,0.000005156537],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002484368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001797649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003190486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006780257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976901,0.0001152814,0.0007838335,0.0008239106,0.00006749333,0.0005194083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984326,0.0005831975,0.0003094383,0.0005509835,0.00005590395,0.00006785731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003449121,0.00009013141,0.8713491,0.0001743711,0.00006156838,0.00001748784,0.003641843,0.01851813,0.000002801356,0.03423049,0.000006993038,0.07156216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006659824,0.0001876958,0.7439576,0.0001252518,0.000005807563,0.00001099887,0.0007546593,0.117863,0.000001423689,0.1350282,0.001035165,0.0003641185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.969868,0.0006309748,0.00006976006,0.0001453879,0.000149545,0.0005401776,0.0001684722,0.00001803781,0.02840963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974676,0.0007550759,0.001239342,0.00004038958,0.0001041711,0.0001256954,0.00009265833,0.00003782612,0.0001371997],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1273915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930273,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08964908426819804,"score_gpt":0.2885383408458048,"score_spread":0.1988892565776067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}