{"id":"W3123285976","doi":"","title":"Beyond Finality: R v Hart and the Ghosts of Convictions Past","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Supreme court; Law; Appeal; Confession (law); Federal Rules of Evidence; Political science; Admissible evidence; Suspect; Reasonable doubt; Duty","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03068071,0.0003652544,0.0009979417,0.001650261,0.01944309,0.01562493,0.003994004,0.02218187,0.004754018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06315038,0.0007998393,0.00113004,0.0009987954,0.04272996,0.0125312,0.008405495,0.02861001,0.0008358486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01000514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01873309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05890699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07239804,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9801839,0.006139387,0.000942629,0.003758118,0.004135124,0.004840841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715865,0.01695456,0.002123975,0.00283061,0.004268781,0.002235572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002154928,0.00001675822,0.001095668,0.00002875906,0.00001412409,0.001217899,0.007020845,0.0001502238,0.00007729963,0.9615501,0.02194813,0.006858648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006288827,0.00009173869,0.002767829,0.0007955814,0.00006711586,0.001709856,0.009808982,0.0006634643,0.0006024572,0.7324895,0.250748,0.0001924768],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1015045,0.009879773,0.01765673,0.3884626,0.003524045,0.0001884017,0.000213558,0.0001925629,0.4783779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8802044,0.001775584,0.002769061,0.08026459,0.001478882,0.00007760288,0.00009188489,0.000107685,0.03323039],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.941093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.162257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0477950287016182,"score_gpt":0.3620190832449032,"score_spread":0.3142240545432849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}