{"id":"W3123345868","doi":"","title":"A Pure Hedonic Theory of Utility and Status: Unhappy But Efficient Invidious Comparisons","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Inefficiency; Economics; Happiness; Expected utility hypothesis; Consumption (sociology); Equating; Welfare; Set (abstract data type); Utility theory; Microeconomics; Inequality; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Public economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology; Computer science; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001802946,0.0004955376,0.0004817721,0.0008059891,0.001026324,0.003478632,0.0009001953,0.0009149354,0.008128983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007435221,0.0002821976,0.0005835905,0.001101201,0.003861989,0.007267324,0.00184794,0.001565647,0.0006176876],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001332811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004580345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009732753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006570303,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988889,0.0005371422,0.00003429004,0.0001997009,0.0002244803,0.000115522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980872,0.0007416651,0.0003848928,0.0004515722,0.000194463,0.0001402779],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001309452,0.000017263,0.0003837088,0.00001158701,0.000006486492,0.00001328295,0.0001320906,0.001381865,0.0001518622,0.992019,0.0003455416,0.005524245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006714362,0.00001529805,0.0005821643,0.000008334367,0.000004896224,0.00002050372,0.00007479309,0.006599844,0.00007528938,0.991358,0.001248692,0.000005553008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2940915,0.0009893917,0.5023248,0.004847683,0.0002275522,0.00009673941,0.0002854188,0.00009706934,0.1970399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729941,0.0003012245,0.01932324,0.0001992904,0.0001101582,0.00005998376,0.00006409037,0.0000247241,0.006923229],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008128983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02719414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09459937346405597,"score_gpt":0.4050021232385682,"score_spread":0.3104027497745122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}