{"id":"W3123431350","doi":"","title":"An Empirical Likelihood Ratio Test for Normality","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Normality; Statistics; Monte Carlo method; Ratio test; Econometrics; Normality test; Likelihood-ratio test; Range (aeronautics); Mathematics; Test (biology); Statistical hypothesis testing; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02497063,0.001067856,0.002502143,0.003797333,0.0008972197,0.004132204,0.003137658,0.00326157,0.01090394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2900799,0.0005054238,0.001199839,0.003250287,0.005089771,0.007805933,0.003240558,0.003354901,0.002620612],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001167796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002144703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000604497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000224011,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9620405,0.02266308,0.001751675,0.004099776,0.008498855,0.0009459766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7696077,0.1975008,0.009863837,0.011103,0.01045755,0.001467128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005876268,0.0002851725,0.04602543,0.0007269979,0.0005810294,0.001409461,0.0008124801,0.03861984,0.00381911,0.5982332,0.01141841,0.2974812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000273212,0.0007270534,0.01906827,0.0004258496,0.0001986992,0.004649019,0.0007042914,0.2161356,0.005292601,0.7317836,0.02049864,0.0002431644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.03281749,0.001086851,0.9509508,0.001802858,0.0002314488,0.0002634834,0.0006247949,0.0007415676,0.01148076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7354904,0.001178139,0.2539514,0.001318681,0.000918933,0.001192939,0.001907198,0.0004309424,0.003611445],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02497063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1320589,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1194513533968041,"score_gpt":0.4565707616964413,"score_spread":0.3371194082996372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}