{"id":"W3123431350","doi":"","title":"An Empirical Likelihood Ratio Test for Normality","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Normality; Statistics; Monte Carlo method; Ratio test; Econometrics; Normality test; Likelihood-ratio test; Range (aeronautics); Mathematics; Test (biology); Statistical hypothesis testing; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00159139,0.0002642222,0.0004592336,0.000180424,0.0002489522,0.0001889168,0.0005709977,0.0004259892,0.0001908522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004792359,0.0002879584,0.000154274,0.0001276576,0.0002717695,0.00009169849,0.0002742781,0.0009848559,0.00002572279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001106178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00107865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002170883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001592439,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973494,0.000152237,0.0008417995,0.0007726484,0.0002497287,0.0006341508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951437,0.002941842,0.0001965355,0.00105071,0.0003352838,0.0003319196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001793201,0.005966084,0.005959673,0.001752165,0.0001494502,0.00001411807,0.0008813869,0.007831791,0.0002696761,0.8184101,0.002835278,0.155751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001178682,0.00018203,0.01525089,0.0001392748,0.00002817971,0.000005780088,0.0003249435,0.1460284,0.0002919653,0.8310595,0.004936012,0.0005743791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1900122,0.00005719842,0.6592183,0.009734714,0.000780792,0.01353716,0.02058717,0.0008469133,0.1052256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9514935,0.0001863935,0.04382487,0.0001792018,0.0002629434,0.002185459,0.001471397,0.00007223972,0.0003240202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7614813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1194513533968041,"score_gpt":0.4565707616964413,"score_spread":0.3371194082996372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}