{"id":"W3123460849","doi":"","title":"Enumeration of Nash Equilibria for Two-Player Games","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Enumeration; Polytope; Lexicographical order; Polyhedron; Nash equilibrium; Vertex (graph theory); Computer science; Implementation; Best response; Combinatorics; Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Algorithm; Discrete mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Graph; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001526446,0.001366619,0.001293794,0.001738761,0.001189126,0.002507605,0.001726655,0.001477702,0.01055572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066923,0.0005818043,0.001095082,0.00138914,0.001682505,0.003902995,0.002301387,0.001550416,0.001623952],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001157529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001392383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001696369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002319639,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983147,0.0007779062,0.0000854403,0.0002494997,0.0003702367,0.0002021438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977062,0.001775623,0.0001298049,0.0001308213,0.0001599134,0.00009758274],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002459754,0.0002789785,0.001327546,0.0004482169,0.00006716243,0.0002114221,0.0006323793,0.2694145,0.002222316,0.6051152,0.004288789,0.1157477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006928243,0.00005923254,0.0001461976,0.00005101716,0.0000138204,0.0001024125,0.0001891793,0.4855867,0.001706858,0.5077603,0.004290428,0.00002453865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.03125856,0.0001443903,0.9504262,0.0002132998,0.00002440263,0.0003044695,0.0002056995,0.0003077217,0.01711523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2638299,0.0003240121,0.7241996,0.0001347658,0.00003409883,0.0007897872,0.0007326463,0.0001406018,0.009814672],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01055572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03531235,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1137339143600152,"score_gpt":0.446336804113192,"score_spread":0.3326028897531769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}