{"id":"W3123495936","doi":"","title":"Empirical Likelihood for Regression Discontinuity Design","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Regression discontinuity design; Empirical likelihood; Nonparametric regression; Covariate; Inference; Mathematics; Regression; Econometrics; Causal inference; Statistics; Nonparametric statistics; Regression analysis; Parametric statistics; Local regression; Computer science; Polynomial regression; Confidence interval; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09647828,0.001596541,0.002870406,0.004126319,0.0008106889,0.004778743,0.005591736,0.005177391,0.006348684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3757088,0.001396602,0.002415813,0.00242702,0.005531628,0.006043748,0.004334087,0.006952185,0.0008760869],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002351078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001795454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008730407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002907593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9318357,0.05438076,0.002082812,0.004390004,0.006348406,0.0009623761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6018034,0.3632261,0.01019476,0.01640111,0.007127543,0.001247008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005443121,0.000149704,0.004292436,0.0006125758,0.0003275581,0.000166768,0.0005050086,0.08082049,0.0005899899,0.8363498,0.001395281,0.07424592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000301316,0.0003377103,0.001561806,0.0003095339,0.0001357441,0.0001646611,0.00008102613,0.3359646,0.001442538,0.6548064,0.0048063,0.00008839568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003611458,0.0004539269,0.9941831,0.0002588136,0.00003683304,0.0001095825,0.00009446583,0.0001476575,0.001104147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3691679,0.001080248,0.6233256,0.0006426874,0.0002944913,0.002376672,0.0007003142,0.000293202,0.002118841],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09647828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.510232,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2743330929785892,"score_gpt":0.5212791377135418,"score_spread":0.2469460447349527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}