{"id":"W3123508446","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1285","title":"The Bungling of Justice Nadon’s Appointment to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Nomination; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Parliament; Politics; Chose; Government (linguistics); Supreme Court Decisions; Political question; Majority opinion","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003336842,0.000222511,0.0003865682,0.0008475561,0.02808161,0.007615849,0.001272522,0.005870011,0.002965439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0139308,0.0004006686,0.0003360235,0.001024509,0.007278627,0.001477527,0.001629505,0.009274868,0.0002754238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07236614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1042249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9739857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933735,0.0008939925,0.0001065242,0.0009006305,0.002667081,0.002058225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951152,0.001432096,0.0001413425,0.0001190848,0.002426418,0.0007659571],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006023554,0.00002115003,0.003116976,0.000089331,0.00003695113,0.001427789,0.01392618,0.0003036143,0.0007965406,0.5900192,0.3686376,0.02156449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001261389,0.00002122725,0.004875019,0.0001347996,0.00002694744,0.0001607371,0.006052888,0.0003461906,0.0008276174,0.01318931,0.9742659,0.00008667819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07275601,0.01633334,0.00276838,0.5452978,0.009953831,0.0001166365,0.0004335107,0.00009442319,0.352246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7151321,0.003862947,0.0009303205,0.1008874,0.0008060745,0.0000307857,0.00006250473,0.00006009663,0.1782277],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07236614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5250555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03000513047340051,"score_gpt":0.289306940117719,"score_spread":0.2593018096443185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}