{"id":"W3123538654","doi":"","title":"The Performance of Islamic vs. Conventional Banks: Evidence on the Suitability of the Basel Capital Ratios","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)","topic":"Islamic Finance and Banking Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Profitability index; Risk-adjusted return on capital; Basel III; Capital (architecture); Capital adequacy ratio; Islam; Business; Quality (philosophy); Capital requirement; Monetary economics; Financial system; Economics; Finance; Microeconomics; Financial capital; Capital formation; Human capital; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01089408,0.0002235468,0.0004559091,0.001543229,0.0004705707,0.004125576,0.0006555901,0.001493657,0.005264847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04966529,0.000207666,0.0002825925,0.00228166,0.002247753,0.002421868,0.001030415,0.0008793582,0.001697331],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007526596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006101845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00234276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00237877,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938549,0.002820612,0.0007008006,0.0006495959,0.00134257,0.0006314154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8841273,0.06368476,0.03446052,0.006262075,0.007563783,0.003901517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005462225,0.0003832707,0.9275229,0.0001697413,0.0004746419,0.0004673124,0.002204063,0.004035688,0.001387485,0.01979606,0.005537815,0.03255869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002553554,0.0006425086,0.9834274,0.00005943647,0.0001283966,0.0002066772,0.002132954,0.00284488,0.00107397,0.006222435,0.00295664,0.00004936228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870421,0.0004583843,0.000151927,0.0008157794,0.00003670271,0.000007850513,0.0003735304,0.00001401501,0.01109965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993966,0.00007097013,0.00001825733,0.00003625855,0.00002968206,0.000001519683,0.0001396581,0.000002421418,0.0003048029],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01089408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05761415,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01157669132398823,"score_gpt":0.1861625168949658,"score_spread":0.1745858255709775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}