{"id":"W3123538654","doi":"","title":"The Performance of Islamic vs. Conventional Banks: Evidence on the Suitability of the Basel Capital Ratios","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)","topic":"Islamic Finance and Banking Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Profitability index; Risk-adjusted return on capital; Basel III; Capital (architecture); Capital adequacy ratio; Islam; Business; Quality (philosophy); Capital requirement; Monetary economics; Financial system; Economics; Finance; Microeconomics; Financial capital; Capital formation; Human capital; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001329733,0.0001980775,0.0002973821,0.00007660325,0.001821809,0.0000505688,0.0009874024,0.00007755791,0.00004669427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005331811,0.0001287604,0.0002714895,0.0004858072,0.001466388,0.0005167997,0.0004788097,0.0002324812,0.00002103082],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005867644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009701171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009039676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002224313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982814,0.00008453731,0.0004067975,0.0003143979,0.0006197852,0.0002930529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996727,0.0006964758,0.001124628,0.0006680656,0.000780012,0.000003803595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001126482,0.0006065426,0.744996,0.001659252,0.0004783524,0.000009119432,0.007214054,0.0001654252,0.04428878,0.1747572,0.01386148,0.01083727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008098599,0.0002809774,0.959502,0.001840833,0.0002652213,0.000006340149,0.002961639,0.006279367,0.02326314,0.001587521,0.002803792,0.0003992803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924202,0.00009150361,0.0000408712,0.001885479,0.0005954977,0.0003527368,0.000004266359,0.00003006249,0.004579397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981245,0.00002328378,0.00006620859,0.0001429595,0.0003576984,0.000001496369,0.000001466014,0.00001189939,0.00127048],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.214506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01157669132398823,"score_gpt":0.1861625168949658,"score_spread":0.1745858255709775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}