{"id":"W3123540217","doi":"","title":"Teleological Justification of Argumentation Schemes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Argumentation theory; Dialogical self; Normative; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Inference; Argumentative; Psychology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01416786,0.0007478861,0.0009313599,0.004671359,0.003351825,0.007271333,0.002529537,0.005923084,0.01146754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04529551,0.0007057099,0.001296786,0.002077532,0.01800405,0.01325695,0.005037569,0.004725222,0.001430412],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005047562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002358041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000941399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009387965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9777143,0.01283865,0.001574088,0.00222104,0.004635657,0.00101624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9616391,0.02106403,0.003125917,0.006455443,0.006899087,0.0008164504],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007434301,0.000004885587,0.00004079257,0.00002529467,0.000003804928,0.00002467608,0.0002609026,0.0002865558,0.00006496243,0.9971359,0.0003140628,0.001830741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001755064,0.000005298938,0.00005558387,0.00004516205,0.000004010123,0.00003851126,0.0001146889,0.002092059,0.0001577975,0.9875097,0.009951883,0.000007780627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03989227,0.002836549,0.5406439,0.01764653,0.001164251,0.0003250114,0.0004175304,0.0005238513,0.39655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8728227,0.0009163958,0.1085385,0.001048383,0.0007539705,0.0004315514,0.000286318,0.0002103128,0.01499189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01416786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07492769,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01532700073197815,"score_gpt":0.2915991055015119,"score_spread":0.2762721047695338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}