{"id":"W3123564505","doi":"","title":"Building the Legitimacy of Whistleblowers: A Multi-Case Discourse Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Legitimacy; Narrative; Political science; Representation (politics); Morality; Public relations; Sociology; Narrative inquiry; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; History; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02055019,0.0008300355,0.0007318851,0.01168267,0.00937607,0.00904392,0.002413992,0.003231448,0.004030299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03659778,0.0006568393,0.0004941122,0.00903139,0.01038235,0.009943852,0.006824533,0.002555223,0.000417504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009045138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002917274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009345726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01008672,"domain_scores_codex":[0.981868,0.01261716,0.0008891547,0.0009464159,0.002384522,0.001294715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9184305,0.0738713,0.002774667,0.00147391,0.002752381,0.0006972322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007195841,0.0001370339,0.007478614,0.0003401087,0.00001719021,0.003285322,0.9481615,0.0002315678,0.001660653,0.02644232,0.0009364212,0.01123726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001674003,0.00003899715,0.006941438,0.0005661364,0.00002669585,0.0006907778,0.9582351,0.001975033,0.002366926,0.006953035,0.02215581,0.00003321715],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.972636,0.000731184,0.006022229,0.002557672,0.00003679049,0.0005569394,0.000418198,0.0000179902,0.01702308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898178,0.0007940482,0.005172022,0.0001633444,0.00003150033,0.0004387535,0.000342628,0.00003275873,0.003207089],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02055019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1086811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1298705078547545,"score_gpt":0.4602130875524876,"score_spread":0.3303425796977331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}