{"id":"W3123649591","doi":"","title":"The Louis-Schmelling Paradox and the League Standing Effect Reconsidered","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"League; Competitor analysis; Economics; Preference; Consumer choice; Order (exchange); Revenue; Test (biology); Microeconomics; Sports economics; Consumer demand; Loss aversion; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00217217,0.000312203,0.0007942353,0.0007626263,0.001360254,0.00298907,0.0007901536,0.002590458,0.01943593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007331689,0.0002055906,0.0007901347,0.0009584041,0.005123401,0.006094612,0.001778638,0.003788591,0.001116482],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001611923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008850603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004698453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003510291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999481,0.0001553892,0.0000209245,0.0001310865,0.0001251617,0.00008650132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965204,0.002179176,0.0004464429,0.0003186837,0.0003070303,0.000228191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009646879,0.0000360239,0.001423139,0.00004888021,0.00001904312,0.0001162219,0.0002548422,0.0009787513,0.0001926692,0.9731215,0.005565077,0.01814735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003816348,0.00002557275,0.00177311,0.00004035274,0.00001141973,0.00007572124,0.000179874,0.001755117,0.0001193783,0.9745044,0.02145928,0.00001759419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3763774,0.02239571,0.04175234,0.1925552,0.001582903,0.00004599336,0.0007263956,0.0001647943,0.3643994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579813,0.004321303,0.003200258,0.009461746,0.00101327,0.00003179409,0.0001125759,0.00006029357,0.02381737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01943593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06501973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05333632669558491,"score_gpt":0.3781157784850155,"score_spread":0.3247794517894306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}