{"id":"W3123717385","doi":"","title":"Collusion Constrained Equilibrium","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca; European Commission; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Collusion; Mathematical economics; Incentive compatibility; Set (abstract data type); Repeated game; Group (periodic table); Microeconomics; Incentive; Limit (mathematics); Best response; Equilibrium selection; Economics; Nash equilibrium; Game theory; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00131097,0.0006166724,0.0009409309,0.0006294032,0.0002264939,0.001050723,0.001234435,0.000832974,0.0008219998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002506217,0.0007584327,0.0005368134,0.0002641942,0.0004408752,0.0009681595,0.001437925,0.000685134,0.0009860476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001738796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003038041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009245532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002435499,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967697,0.0001863202,0.0006845646,0.001067673,0.0001477381,0.001144039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974138,0.0004237879,0.0007680462,0.0008266069,0.00007001979,0.000497712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005156929,0.0004619106,0.09345246,0.0006670115,0.001147799,0.001253401,0.004466094,0.0002629029,0.001081846,0.8839391,0.009376795,0.003374913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003952029,0.0002918575,0.02752341,0.0009154548,0.0001134132,0.0003284786,0.001334974,0.003235388,0.0001913968,0.8833357,0.07654607,0.002231838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6758625,0.0004909478,0.007105838,0.0007029378,0.0005277702,0.0004838251,0.001776266,0.0002716388,0.3127783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776585,0.00004470224,0.0005761524,0.0002016757,0.0001900676,0.00002323192,0.0002246517,0.0001060528,0.02097502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3017959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01164649837200373,"score_gpt":0.2205930267675896,"score_spread":0.2089465283955858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}