{"id":"W3123941891","doi":"","title":"A Study of Exclusionary Coalitions: The Canadian Sugar Coalition, 1888–1889","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Sugar industry; Commons; Liability; Business; Industrial organization; Economics; Law and economics; Sugar; Political science; Market economy; Law; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002472695,0.0003599878,0.0004646901,0.003521589,0.02555919,0.004993025,0.001558557,0.001881982,0.004738763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005835126,0.0003343841,0.0003142833,0.005217108,0.02411932,0.002527443,0.003316548,0.002955193,0.0002583712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1053623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07316547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9891151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974151,0.000255411,0.00003323047,0.0002561115,0.0008923524,0.001147901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974238,0.0006219574,0.0003242971,0.0001772606,0.00087276,0.0005799905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004678134,0.00002849396,0.01078826,0.00004174802,0.00002097225,0.0005878693,0.06828342,0.001095618,0.0002162972,0.8904471,0.008704497,0.01973903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003610091,0.00003699016,0.07414635,0.000258654,0.00004469284,0.0003362169,0.06941214,0.001709654,0.0006581032,0.07725698,0.7759867,0.0001174199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4892296,0.005157019,0.004080748,0.01198469,0.0001529129,0.00009670774,0.000419954,0.00002296092,0.4888554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651788,0.001602833,0.0008296806,0.0007995528,0.00004697113,0.00002912304,0.00015104,0.00001773331,0.03134427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1053623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7644607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05168095717872346,"score_gpt":0.3247873344939455,"score_spread":0.273106377315222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}