{"id":"W3124000299","doi":"","title":"Evaluating Foreign Exchange Market Intervention: Self-Selection, Counterfactuals and Average Treatment Effects","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Economic Policies and Impacts","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Intervention (counseling); Average treatment effect; Foreign exchange market; Matching (statistics); Central bank; Foreign exchange; Econometrics; Propensity score matching; Economics; Monetary economics; Medicine; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Monetary policy; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1446742,0.001130698,0.002930645,0.002273914,0.0007796732,0.002657086,0.002100071,0.003821999,0.006079504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2540528,0.0006654204,0.003745221,0.002107309,0.004242477,0.002413459,0.002463444,0.002557862,0.0004033427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001831475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001576967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002367092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001065474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8864999,0.1016798,0.003375122,0.004279982,0.002901391,0.001263831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5430338,0.3990497,0.02924559,0.02485504,0.002656395,0.001159489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.05097525,0.01576367,0.3512185,0.002575609,0.03231646,0.0007078975,0.002459274,0.1776222,0.002123584,0.1177495,0.006274524,0.2402135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009695955,0.03044111,0.2350391,0.0005771413,0.01761182,0.0003360375,0.001350047,0.5550826,0.01149802,0.1287646,0.00920758,0.0003960614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8385195,0.002216807,0.1455303,0.001785879,0.0006541222,0.003465694,0.00145335,0.0003880222,0.005986332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768125,0.0002673306,0.01905262,0.0003530768,0.0001588936,0.001961206,0.0005114627,0.00002634195,0.0008565274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1446742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7651197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03346744460364787,"score_gpt":0.2480836078680323,"score_spread":0.2146161632643845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}