{"id":"W3124038879","doi":"10.1145/3355902","title":"The Unreasonable Fairness of Maximum Nash Welfare","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":287,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Patras; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Fair division; Minimax; Nash equilibrium; Economics; Welfare; Product (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Property (philosophy); Microeconomics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003834059,0.00009034488,0.0002014186,0.00007691816,0.0001987259,0.00006285073,0.0001527799,0.00005535099,0.00005040133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009375008,0.00008930906,0.00006691911,0.00007178434,0.00004051144,0.0001260495,0.000005813526,0.00007927219,0.0001206325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003163979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008214345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009722428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002033828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992619,0.00001682434,0.0003713927,0.0002104271,0.00001284145,0.00012657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999323,0.0001460527,0.000227212,0.0002515346,0.00002118982,0.0000310886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008744132,0.00009706034,0.004027463,0.00006763876,0.0001254125,1.942826e-7,0.0005083102,0.05506663,0.000009428224,0.8475131,0.00001631435,0.09248097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002348797,0.0005122735,0.03875622,0.00006389368,0.00002535284,0.00002057784,0.001821725,0.1216095,0.0004690255,0.7845451,0.04917464,0.0006528335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.957339,0.0002332319,0.03611337,0.001176996,0.0006579748,0.000221884,0.00005802058,0.00002100916,0.004178506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988785,0.000199395,0.0002591154,0.00003750792,0.00001563365,0.00001105372,0.000005513172,0.00001319278,0.000580037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09182814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3641918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01660050170527125,"score_gpt":0.20568765792482,"score_spread":0.1890871562195488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}