{"id":"W3124054510","doi":"","title":"A Rule-driven Approach for Defining the Behavior of Negotiating Software Agents","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Common value auction; Software agent; Task (project management); Process (computing); Bidding; Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics; Engineering; Political science; Programming language; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00406553,0.001137409,0.0009157106,0.001203264,0.001113434,0.004610305,0.004368216,0.00232781,0.004126793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007424358,0.001309475,0.002946011,0.0007656953,0.001859214,0.002461353,0.002036461,0.00302816,0.001803988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001598192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003877932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009554046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0136876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962115,0.001202872,0.000450283,0.0006040011,0.001283421,0.0002478339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969048,0.001483234,0.0002355573,0.0005318797,0.0007029706,0.0001416544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002954703,0.000433497,0.002676429,0.0009384954,0.000326633,0.001167177,0.002146603,0.4681201,0.03172547,0.3170192,0.0044736,0.1706774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006426007,0.0001094587,0.0002968995,0.0001480844,0.0001325735,0.0002850429,0.000246745,0.8849754,0.01555518,0.06104875,0.03704936,0.00008834573],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002574502,0.00006276362,0.9936812,0.0001052641,0.00003182999,0.0003216126,0.0001222151,0.000873997,0.002226574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06492585,0.0002719731,0.9286323,0.0001624763,0.00001925361,0.0007639874,0.0004276267,0.0002569325,0.004539475],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009554046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02150083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03243000722600527,"score_gpt":0.2466519276602389,"score_spread":0.2142219204342336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}