{"id":"W3124063101","doi":"","title":"A\"Delphi exercise\"as a tool in Amazon rainforest valuation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amazon rainforest; Rainforest; Willingness to pay; Tropical rainforest; Purchasing power parity; Valuation (finance); Contingent valuation; Geography; Socioeconomics; Biodiversity; Economics; Agricultural economics; Business; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3066187,0.002140527,0.001555663,0.005628095,0.007445176,0.007321642,0.004258655,0.004287465,0.02452614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.260784,0.002511668,0.001863681,0.005101824,0.006375202,0.006882816,0.01784691,0.006859791,0.004134186],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005413307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01248511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001955488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004104478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6118218,0.3626102,0.009182676,0.003460797,0.008898151,0.004026443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6604586,0.2988563,0.005005144,0.01157055,0.01994779,0.004161499],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001753294,0.002696597,0.006513669,0.005819395,0.0002842063,0.002360401,0.2458048,0.01896287,0.006412485,0.1825953,0.09861495,0.4281821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002017149,0.003237189,0.01124405,0.01008101,0.0002386337,0.00135577,0.2396353,0.07565235,0.006419684,0.2887226,0.3604057,0.0009905789],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1193649,0.0007281992,0.6647339,0.02282705,0.00188739,0.076514,0.002220633,0.001627013,0.1100968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.161655,0.0003716873,0.7408403,0.003190971,0.0001699762,0.08690494,0.0004624373,0.0002918314,0.006113019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3066187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8550627,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.106737849136285,"score_gpt":0.2956342754312756,"score_spread":0.1888964262949906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}