{"id":"W3124204338","doi":"10.1017/s0922156504001657","title":"Maritime Boundary Delimitation in a Federal Domestic Setting: The <i>Newfoundland and Labrador</i> v. <i>Nova Scotia</i> Arbitration","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Maritime boundary; Nova scotia; Political science; Arbitration; Boundary (topology); Law; Legislation; Sovereignty; International law; Jurisprudence; Law of the sea; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Order (exchange); Geography; Municipal law; Archaeology; Business; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006418689,0.0001408526,0.0001482525,0.00007211608,0.0001137214,0.0003049254,0.0003762795,0.00005768193,0.0003678437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001648302,0.0001108621,0.0000653699,0.0001216743,0.0002771654,0.001040662,0.0001125337,0.0003176118,0.00009148851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000548421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004838714,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00749701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03266502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998408,0.00007250993,0.0005429809,0.0001735619,0.0006286888,0.0001742255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992483,0.0001950701,0.0003004205,0.00009082677,0.0001005251,0.00006488008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007118331,0.0006115622,0.5064234,0.0000324313,0.0002434339,0.0008008482,0.002653764,0.03195109,0.009239145,0.4400797,0.002157939,0.00509485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005429001,0.0005175505,0.6578906,0.0005360713,0.00004958591,0.004664404,0.0003200966,0.00153484,0.001333553,0.3000635,0.02708924,0.0005715786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.936949,0.0002118735,0.001096951,0.01647557,0.0008282141,0.0001933781,0.00000707606,0.00001249226,0.04422546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919995,0.00003002332,0.004229126,0.003198997,0.000238485,0.000002597262,0.0000105387,0.00001444343,0.0002762831],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1514671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006663380131121007,"score_gpt":0.2433871768429719,"score_spread":0.2367237967118509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}