{"id":"W3124228295","doi":"","title":"Analogical Reasoning and Semantic Rules of Inference","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Inference; Predicate (mathematical logic); Abstraction; Computer science; Analogical reasoning; Rule of inference; Defeasible reasoning; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Deductive reasoning; Natural language processing; Meaning (existential); Accidental; Rhetoric; Similarity (geometry); Semantic feature; Epistemology; Psychology; Programming language; Linguistics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007495917,0.000125748,0.0002871696,0.0001882494,0.0001543063,0.00003611731,0.0006123205,0.0001298373,0.00002519883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001835753,0.0001360387,0.00007184265,0.0002669962,0.000124266,0.0009941785,0.0004627552,0.0001571145,0.00003339862],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005051752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007250179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001967116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007453065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986906,0.0001795676,0.0001787073,0.0003366826,0.000414176,0.0002002344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988434,0.00009740542,0.0002629827,0.0003842981,0.0002082244,0.0002036409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001114573,0.000179981,0.9304834,0.0001688626,0.00008441383,0.00005760807,0.01064346,0.0001262391,0.01369992,0.03899055,0.0001977649,0.005256362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001329741,0.0001904375,0.9854481,0.0002346461,0.00002884978,0.00002244722,0.0007248271,0.007845773,0.001617978,0.001940896,0.0003587694,0.000257599],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9772137,0.0001592165,0.02127592,0.0001974117,0.0000805509,0.0001137321,0.00000692051,0.00004530635,0.0009072096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886135,0.0000155495,0.01105723,0.00001873602,0.00001706942,1.224947e-7,0.000005149776,0.000004527726,0.0002680954],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05496466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5547498,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04898880686321374,"score_gpt":0.249732164544898,"score_spread":0.2007433576816843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}