{"id":"W3124271790","doi":"","title":"WHERE ECONOMICS AND PHILOSOPHY MEET: REVIEW OF THE ELGAR COMPANION TO ECONOMICS AND PHILOSOPHY WITH RESPONSES FROM THE AUTHORS*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economic methodology; Philosophy and economics; Neuroeconomics; Positive economics; Applied economics; Schools of economic thought; Mainstream economics; Complexity economics; Human development theory; Social science; Sociology; Epistemology; Neoclassical economics; Economics; Philosophy of sport; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006225189,0.0002249294,0.0005274736,0.00007474553,0.0002844275,0.00007303144,0.00034647,0.00008664856,0.0001407879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004861679,0.0001605779,0.0001008224,0.0001119909,0.0003531224,0.0002789931,0.0001596376,0.0001270857,0.00005045962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006622347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004384999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005075006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006553023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985237,0.00005412962,0.000743403,0.0004696002,0.00001436881,0.0001947671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986168,0.0002098313,0.0004209317,0.0006474472,0.00002479498,0.00008025308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005033084,0.00003088725,0.01543997,0.0001006929,0.00004933875,1.78006e-7,0.00008064766,0.0001802276,0.000001946057,0.9827074,0.001209324,0.0001490071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006601986,0.0001010556,0.02127936,0.0007433877,0.00004200208,0.00001364716,0.00006171182,0.0003653704,0.00008004563,0.6310397,0.3452041,0.0004094717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8232099,0.03681269,0.000140399,0.04091156,0.0003621828,0.0008255419,0.001230455,0.00002975783,0.09647748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9532989,0.04104558,0.0007481111,0.003986147,0.0002970438,0.00003111482,0.00001744305,0.00003099521,0.0005446101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3516678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6548175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02632057075728746,"score_gpt":0.2054502488698108,"score_spread":0.1791296781125233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}