{"id":"W3124286190","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1508.06182","title":"Solving the Optimal Trading Trajectory Problem Using a Quantum Annealer","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Quantum annealing; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Scalability; Portfolio optimization; Quantum; Inversion (geology); Optimization problem; Portfolio; Simulated annealing; Covariance matrix; Mathematics; Quantum algorithm; Algorithm; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006596064,0.0002906916,0.0005172175,0.0002487359,0.0004859702,0.0009196501,0.0006297108,0.001321471,0.005101149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001627928,0.0003567567,0.0004413139,0.000440972,0.0007545179,0.001309308,0.0007549432,0.001006379,0.000277703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007742004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008252453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002859717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002428025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998378,0.00006039285,0.000008546515,0.0000298854,0.00003515428,0.00002815579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999541,0.000319366,0.0000345352,0.00003990988,0.00003276479,0.0000324259],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000583017,0.00004283968,0.000360923,0.00003130905,0.00002034369,0.00007111856,0.00005018056,0.8866563,0.001518693,0.09836907,0.0007055518,0.01211521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000151602,0.00001713485,0.00005043076,0.000002554277,0.000002314686,0.000008536699,0.000009985124,0.9835485,0.0003039477,0.01563686,0.0004008069,0.000003814009],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1268197,0.0002257484,0.8534485,0.001284208,0.00006467343,0.00008286891,0.00009758629,0.0001241409,0.01785265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7932735,0.0001844583,0.1960717,0.0001681225,0.00002634288,0.0001844848,0.00008651415,0.00005697192,0.009947781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005101149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01706505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1103065760586086,"score_gpt":0.3040292775233587,"score_spread":0.1937227014647501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}