{"id":"W3124297494","doi":"","title":"Calibration without Reduction for Non-Expected Utility","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Calibration; Risk aversion (psychology); Axiom; Econometrics; Reduction (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Decision maker; Economics; Class (philosophy); Prospect theory; Subjective expected utility; Computer science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Management science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006936651,0.001085959,0.001271833,0.00122881,0.0006283437,0.002635698,0.002324013,0.002355009,0.01509876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04072535,0.000815067,0.002559572,0.0009192418,0.002840557,0.008127814,0.003570278,0.006237368,0.002314462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00193029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001019585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005234655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003471475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947448,0.002061486,0.00027803,0.001154325,0.001369944,0.0003913487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819209,0.00954569,0.001306345,0.005503884,0.001467516,0.0002557716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002088956,0.00003634075,0.0003880503,0.00005643286,0.00002799371,0.00004787792,0.00007571671,0.01316671,0.0004423067,0.9738691,0.001311687,0.01055693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001193574,0.00001316163,0.0001958844,0.00001432323,0.000008827142,0.00004605909,0.00001387831,0.03873282,0.0003726555,0.9589266,0.00165007,0.00001383249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04539687,0.0005507922,0.9043836,0.002516472,0.0001961737,0.000110815,0.0003379911,0.0004592282,0.04604805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8523178,0.0008307935,0.1285477,0.001390332,0.0002906827,0.0002753719,0.00054235,0.000322786,0.01548221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01509876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05051035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2337513606489494,"score_gpt":0.4679283542055984,"score_spread":0.2341769935566489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}