{"id":"W3124428616","doi":"","title":"Competition in the International Niobium Market: An Econometric Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Niobium; Market power; Complementarity (molecular biology); Dominance (genetics); Economics; Competition (biology); Supply and demand; International economics; Industrial organization; International trade; Market economy; Macroeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003622193,0.0005130302,0.001485026,0.001317792,0.0009432992,0.003404505,0.001245255,0.002124567,0.01481677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008570473,0.0004420688,0.001665679,0.002417961,0.001813901,0.002432734,0.001679119,0.003348984,0.001714571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001922453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001235756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02970169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01720079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985259,0.0007085752,0.00004817185,0.0001655026,0.0001446437,0.0004072347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844716,0.01184848,0.001991455,0.0003427301,0.0004196733,0.0009259859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005086456,0.004761879,0.5501576,0.0007051539,0.001938207,0.006800918,0.004180272,0.2033165,0.002685799,0.1525813,0.0207569,0.04702916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007355188,0.00179761,0.2248744,0.0001252666,0.0008488337,0.000689464,0.009502892,0.7230875,0.0007242631,0.02674299,0.01062678,0.0002444198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805467,0.0008718346,0.006307315,0.0014378,0.00004794103,0.00008613097,0.0007837985,0.00006523953,0.009853258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994065,0.000445735,0.0005474489,0.0001228173,0.0000695538,0.00003747819,0.000795151,0.00001325333,0.003903545],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02970169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05905759,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04931168959894716,"score_gpt":0.2484988055892612,"score_spread":0.1991871159903141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}