{"id":"W3124458631","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.434720","title":"Incidental Trends and the Power of Panel Unit Root Tests","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Economic Growth and Productivity","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Unit root; Mathematics; Gaussian; Envelope (radar); Power (physics); Panel data; Homogeneous; Unit root test; Score test; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Sample (material); Econometrics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Combinatorics; Computer science; Physics; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05212869,0.001153977,0.002154995,0.003645893,0.000993769,0.004058628,0.00235731,0.002783266,0.008646908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4122405,0.0007744395,0.001377746,0.003869404,0.005058217,0.007836516,0.00240564,0.004110447,0.0009743599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005167213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007161972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009782456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007196873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9706889,0.02175054,0.001066364,0.003692295,0.002090536,0.0007114214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2123238,0.7495103,0.01182146,0.02152518,0.003517752,0.001301509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00342654,0.0003308943,0.2716379,0.0008599544,0.004497002,0.002169165,0.002807068,0.06517378,0.002311344,0.2817267,0.01582266,0.349237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005486895,0.0007560712,0.05701511,0.0002632229,0.001031372,0.000711086,0.0009059069,0.2548784,0.002720014,0.6745937,0.006438703,0.000137698],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.5954949,0.007588193,0.3627249,0.006759394,0.0009375576,0.00008780203,0.001693257,0.001283078,0.023431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880349,0.0005901313,0.008659152,0.000285055,0.0005413927,0.00003127563,0.0004798054,0.0001621739,0.00121603],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05212869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2756861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02293556077015581,"score_gpt":0.2255371679065483,"score_spread":0.2026016071363925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}