{"id":"W3124481985","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of Preferences and Competition: A Rationalization of Veblen's Theory of Invidious Comparisons","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalization (economics); Premise; Economics; Competition (biology); Veblen good; Context (archaeology); Population; Natural selection; Mathematical economics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002774803,0.0002723036,0.0004137235,0.0007868407,0.001136634,0.002684804,0.001417981,0.001353657,0.006845304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009103747,0.0001748665,0.0005403215,0.000682767,0.007800185,0.005395962,0.002013027,0.001573587,0.0004632611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00170906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004658718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001062447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001245579,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987255,0.0008030208,0.00002228389,0.0001673223,0.0001639659,0.0001179706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976881,0.001319606,0.0002991472,0.0003439013,0.0001880971,0.0001611934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008193771,0.000006111783,0.0003335821,0.000006301115,0.000005198205,0.00002540369,0.0003330384,0.001960725,0.0001020248,0.994117,0.0002083229,0.002894052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005436761,0.000007641964,0.0002567708,0.00000518712,0.000002400197,0.00003767456,0.0001269654,0.005361302,0.00004256122,0.9927601,0.00138868,0.00000530937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2713824,0.00111109,0.3294407,0.01017207,0.000132368,0.0000976333,0.0001104379,0.00007759213,0.3874758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762123,0.0002023121,0.01807594,0.0002761131,0.00003785859,0.00006416495,0.00001786757,0.00001953884,0.005094002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006845304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02289981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01124133039448753,"score_gpt":0.2530140724373234,"score_spread":0.2417727420428359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}