{"id":"W3124500806","doi":"10.1080/21649502.2017.1292041","title":"An empirical study of the dynamics of implied volatility indices: international evidence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Finance Letters","topic":"Stochastic processes and financial applications","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond; Marcus Foundation","keywords":"Affine transformation; Econometrics; Stochastic volatility; Volatility (finance); Mathematics; Linear model; Variance (accounting); Elasticity (physics); Constant elasticity of variance model; Economics; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Forward volatility; Physics; Accounting; Thermodynamics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006697852,0.0006093726,0.0007309476,0.001776203,0.0002744201,0.003124359,0.001263057,0.001185632,0.00319263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04471695,0.0004048648,0.0009643597,0.003594841,0.001265685,0.006091802,0.001128144,0.002283119,0.0006944888],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006562221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003403873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003426004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001400223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985177,0.0005708417,0.0001568405,0.0003690066,0.0003151246,0.00007045388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9567997,0.02889149,0.008077209,0.003463359,0.00235799,0.0004103033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006723318,0.0002647064,0.6621321,0.0008858274,0.001721484,0.0006864729,0.001495091,0.1079233,0.002415248,0.1276655,0.004536437,0.08960146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001669981,0.0005668301,0.5650725,0.001181152,0.0009290163,0.001444221,0.001862233,0.3405202,0.005834069,0.05851996,0.02364102,0.0002619073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552767,0.00821184,0.01878246,0.002016427,0.00007475139,0.0000235643,0.001266842,0.0001330331,0.01421445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930786,0.002717928,0.001681271,0.00007352913,0.00005792658,0.00000610512,0.001873185,0.00004070016,0.0004707469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006697852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03542203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06797194222231359,"score_gpt":0.3248998132841395,"score_spread":0.2569278710618259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}