{"id":"W3124503365","doi":"","title":"Hub-Periphery Development Pattern and Inclusive Growth: Case Study of Guangdong Province","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Regional Economic and Spatial Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"China; Comparative advantage; Sustainable development; Inclusive growth; Production (economics); Business; Economic geography; Chinese economy; Upgrade; Economy; Economic system; International trade; Geography; Economic growth; Economics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003231209,0.0001667601,0.0001511867,0.001075172,0.001687468,0.0007568499,0.0004636832,0.0002933471,0.001477065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005362884,0.0001051975,0.0002165391,0.002956358,0.001115643,0.0005158741,0.001299914,0.0003193427,0.00008791249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00425342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002259989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2958692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4409517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998271,0.00004388262,0.000007534644,0.00002886433,0.00002285114,0.00006981535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997528,0.00006669806,0.00004766549,0.00002428468,0.00003591015,0.00007269354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001998768,0.000333293,0.8503526,0.0001711175,0.00006294845,0.02306946,0.05996241,0.005477917,0.002399101,0.01308073,0.00241819,0.04247225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000339166,0.0001423675,0.8432586,0.00005881393,0.0000655089,0.00158176,0.1313088,0.007323534,0.0008681718,0.001758296,0.0135652,0.00003487183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966236,0.00005865936,0.0001014787,0.00008844941,0.000001319532,0.00001032077,0.00005058962,0.000002931049,0.00306255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982644,0.0001275011,0.0001653121,0.00001116201,0.000001117649,0.000006940523,0.00005679276,0.000001614072,0.001365283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2958692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5882941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06207073415660975,"score_gpt":0.2984010385213579,"score_spread":0.2363303043647482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}