{"id":"W3124524091","doi":"10.1075/ps.16051.kos","title":"Epistemic and deontic authority in the<i>argumentum ad verecundiam</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics and Society","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Deontic logic; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Ambiguity; Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Fallacy; Set (abstract data type); Negation; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008019177,0.00007995787,0.0001220946,0.00001252475,0.00009011662,0.0001537056,0.0001831765,0.00005564543,0.000002786155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001259939,0.00005828155,0.00003820561,0.0001040359,0.0000197536,0.0002005436,0.00008353168,0.0001074711,0.00001025853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002028092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001597039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004808138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001453352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992558,0.00008138047,0.0001761604,0.00018137,0.0001634591,0.0001418547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995186,0.0001278766,0.00007590045,0.0002269855,0.00001650269,0.00003410007],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007343942,0.0004879865,0.2620547,0.002392556,0.00014605,0.00001006174,0.2406789,0.00004536095,0.003451501,0.4346915,0.006907015,0.049127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001693104,0.0001208566,0.320798,0.000187692,0.00002331038,0.00003405918,0.003298256,0.6479654,0.00008448376,0.01660614,0.008739445,0.0004492355],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9652781,0.0006134095,0.03146717,0.001302494,0.0002525183,0.0004144609,0.000001698899,0.00002477705,0.0006453549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925391,0.0002663023,0.006751904,0.0002904869,0.00001519305,0.000009887133,0.000001380546,0.000003182221,0.0001225413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6479201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2376653,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009166461708308494,"score_gpt":0.2284404188945613,"score_spread":0.2192739571862528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}